Login

You are not currently logged in.

Country club gets variance for new chemical building

The Orchard Lake Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) has voted unanimously to grant approval to the Orchard Lake Country Club to construct a chemical storage building near the existing equipment storage structure on the north side of Old Orchard Trail.

City Council member Ann Hartzell, who is a member of the club located at 5000 West Shore Drive off Old Orchard Trail, recused herself from voting on the issue at the Monday, Aug. 20 meeting.

The city’s zoning ordinance permits accessory buildings within Zone 4, with a front yard setback requirement of 70 feet. The new chemical storage building proposed had a setback of 42 feet, 8 inches; therefore, a front yard setback variance was needed to proceed with construction.

“Essentially it’s in line with the equipment storage building that’s there now,” said Director of City Services Gerry McCallum.

Several Shady Beach residents attended the meeting to voice concerns that there could be potential dangers associated with a chemical building adjacent to residential property.

“A lot of dialogue took place, but it was a zoning issue,” McCallum said. “It’s called a chemical building, but it’s just for pesticides for the greens and fairways.”

“It’s a variance — I don’t think we are aware of any immediate environmental issues,” said Mayor Bruce McIntyre. “The things used on the golf course are the same as what are used in yards.”

The club is also required to screen the area on Old Orchard Trail with trees and shrubs.

“Most of the concern expressed by council had to with screening requirements between the road and the building,” McIntyre said.

The club most likely will begin construction soon — it is already behind schedule.

“This is the final step — there were a number of things that preceded it,” McIntyre said. “They are already behind schedule in building (the new structure) because of the special use and variance approvals.”

A special use modification was approved on June 18 for adding a new building and relocating portions of the existing building on the site in conjunction with an infrastructure restoration project.

2 Responses to Country club gets variance for new chemical building

  1. crazy townie

    August 25, 2012 at 2:49 pm

    “It’s a variance — I don’t think we are aware of any immediate environmental issues,” said Mayor Bruce McIntyre. “The things used on the golf course are the same as what are used in yards.”

    Bruce, home owners do not require licensing from the DNR to apply lawn product but golf course operators do… Why is that?

    • AJ

      August 25, 2012 at 11:00 pm

      The fact that the public is exposed to the golf courses’ chemicals probably plays a huge role in the reasoning behind their stricter regulation. So even if the golf courses do use the same chemicals in the same proportions as would a private residence (and I’m not saying they do), the number of people who are exposed to those chemicals is considerably higher. Thus so is the liability should something go wrong. Hence one reason why businesses and private residences are regulated differently despite their use of many of the same chemical products.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login