Login

You are not currently logged in.

Stop involving Ureste, husband sparks W. Bloomfield fracas

A West Bloomfield Township police officer has been suspended for his conduct during a recent traffic stop involving township Supervisor Michele Economou Ureste and her husband, Matthew Ureste.

West Bloomfield Police Chief Michael Patton said the police department has concluded an investigation into the incident, adding that the officer didn’t follow department policy during the traffic stop that took place in the early morning hours of Saturday, Aug. 13, when the officer drove a motorist and a passenger home after administering a preliminary breath test (PBT) to the driver, but no other sobriety tests.

“We’ve concluded the investigation and the department has disciplined him because an intoxicated driver was not handled correctly,” Patton said. “In our review, according to our policy, this was the incorrect thing to do.”

Patton wouldn’t reveal the identity of the police officer, but Lt. Tim Diamond said the officer received a five-day unpaid suspension. Patton also didn’t reveal the identity of the motorist, the passenger, or the results of the PBT.

However, documents obtained by the Spinal Column Newsweekly through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) indicate that Michele Economou Ureste was the passenger and her husband, Matthew Ureste, was the driver.

According to the documents, the traffic stop took place at 2:18 a.m. on Aug. 13 when Officer Robert Stephens observed a car run a red light at the intersection of Green Lake and Richardson roads.

“It was a flashing light and the officer was approaching the intersection … when they made a right-hand turn heading northbound,” Patton said.

The car was then pulled over on Welland Drive off Green Lake Road, according to the documents. Stephens spoke with Matthew Ureste, the driver, and reportedly detected an odor of intoxicants in the vehicle coming from one or both occupants. Stephens also noted that Matthew Ureste had watery eyes and admitted to drinking alcohol earlier in the evening. The couple were returning home after attending a Kid Rock concert in Detroit, according to the documents.

Stephens asked Matthew Ureste to submit to a PBT and he consented. The results of Matthew Ureste’s PBT was a 0.11 percent blood-alcohol content, according to the documents obtained through FOIA. The legal limit is 0.08 percent. No other field sobriety tests were conducted. Stephens informed Matthew Ureste he was too intoxicated to drive home, and offered him and Economou Ureste a ride home in his patrol vehicle, according to the documents.

Patton said that the department became aware of the traffic stop on Monday, Aug. 15 and that it seemed apparent that the department’s policies may have been violated during the traffic stop.

He added that the Michigan Vehicle Code states that an officer may arrest a person based in whole or in part upon the results of a preliminary chemical breath analysis.

Patton then initiated an internal investigation that was headed by Lt. Diamond. The investigation concluded on Friday, Aug. 26 with the suspension of Stephens.

“Our focus has been on the conduct and decision-making of the officer. There are no direct or indirect allegations against the people stopped,” Patton said. “The investigation would not have made a difference if they were known or unknown, the policy is plain enough. No one is being charged criminally, arrested or ticketed.”

Asked why he didn’t arrest Matthew Ureste, Stephens reportedly stated that he didn’t want to arrest the township supervisor’s husband; it was a busy shift and didn’t want to get tied up on an operating while intoxicated arrested; that he was concerned that an arrest would compromise an upcoming public safety millage vote.

West Bloomfield police submitted a report on the traffic stop and an in-car video recording of the incident to the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office, which found there was insufficient evidence to establish any crime.

Paul Walton, chief assistant prosecutor in the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office, said that a PBT alone isn’t admissible in court by the Prosecutor’s Office.

“We would have to have evidence he was intoxicated, either through field sobriety, bad driving or observations by an officer,” Walton said. “Bad driving is insufficient in itself. We have to have some evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

The Urestes were front and center at a special meeting of the West Bloomfield Township Board of Trustees on Monday, Aug. 29.

The meeting was scheduled to approve tentative contract agreements between the township and its public safety unions, including the police officers union, but much of the meeting was dominated by public comments about the traffic stop.

Matthew Ureste spoke at length during the public comment portion of the meeting, defending himself and his wife, saying that he wasn’t intoxicated that night but that he was extremely tired and that he and his wife were never informed that he blew over the legal blood-alcohol limit.

He added that Stephens asked him if he wanted a ride home and he accepted.

Economou Ureste said that her husband wasn’t intoxicated, that they were both tired and that there was no video evidence that Matthew Ureste ran a red light.

“My husband and I have never sued for damages, but a malicious assault has defamed our hard-earned family name by unsubstantiated allegations made from a police department against my husband in a routine traffic stop without a shred of evidence of wrongdoing,” she said. “I have battled unsavory politics. I’m also obviously a great threat amongst my fellow trustees with pending elections.”

Ureste also said she has had political enemies since she called into question Patton’s appointment as police chief.

Last fall, she, along with Trustee Steve Kaplan, filed a declaratory lawsuit seeking a ruling regarding a township policy amendment stating that any board member, and not the supervisor alone, can recommend the termination of a department head and a majority board vote would be needed to carry out the recommendation.

Kaplan said previously the township supervisor would have to recommend to the board the hiring and termination of a department head and a majority board vote would be needed, and that the township’s amendment is contrary to a state statute granting a township superintendent those responsibilities.

Those claims were dismissed by Oakland County Circuit Court Judge Rudy J. Nichols in January.

Patton’s appointment to the police chief position was approved by a 5-2 vote last October, with Economou Ureste and Kaplan casting the votes against his appointment.

Many township residents spoke at the Aug. 29 meeting, with a majority criticizing Economou Ureste and some even calling for her resignation.

Economou Ureste’s predecessor, former township supervisor David Flaisher, also gave his support to Patton while former trustee Robert Spector also spoke out against the current supervisor.

Township Clerk Cathy Shaughnessy said that it was possible that abuse of authority may have played a part in Stephens’ decision to give the couple a ride home, but that it may never be known.

Township Trustee Gene Farber said Patton’s investigation was by the book and that he resented any implication that anything the police department did was politically motivated.

Township Trustee Howard Rosenberg claimed that Ureste was attempting to make herself a victim by defaming the police chief.

Township Treasurer Teri Weingarden said the issue was a distraction from the township’s push for a renewal of its public safety millage and authorization to increase the public safety millage, which will be voted on by township residents during the Nov. 8 general election.

“Our public safety millage is vital,” Weingarden said.

8 Responses to Stop involving Ureste, husband sparks W. Bloomfield fracas

  1. Time to consider

    August 31, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    Before voting on this millage, we want a true cost/benefit comparison of keeping this police department vs. contracting with the Oakland County Sheriff.

    • B

      August 31, 2011 at 7:50 pm

      Agree. These politicians can handle themselves let alone a staff, so maybe there would be efficincies by contracting out to professionals.

  2. Tom

    August 31, 2011 at 6:32 pm

    Funny (or even sad part) of this whole mess is that prior to the advent of all this modern technology of cameras, recording devices and computers in patrol cars, an incident such as this where the police would perform a “park and ride (home)” was quite common and since it never got released or reported, rarely ever raised a single eyebrow. That was then, and this is the world now where modern technology and politics continue to clash. And cause giant messes such as this one.

    All that aside though. Had Ms Michelle big ego not taken over and sent her even bigger yap into orbit, this whole thing may of never gotten as out of control as it is now.

  3. B

    August 31, 2011 at 7:48 pm

    When will West Bloomfield politicians put their egos to rest and grow up? Miss Michelle Hyphen Name needs to understand that anyone else would have been arrested and spent the night in jail. The officer eliminated the collection of any evidence by not following protocol and therefore her husband is safe to drink and drive another day. Michelle, enjoy the gift that you have been given and stop flapping your lips about how everyone is out to get you.

  4. LB

    September 1, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    After watching this video, I have not seen this aspect addressed: What about the officer in the car BEHIND Officer Stephens? Why was this officer not disciplined for allowing the breaking of procedure as well? Did he/she know what was going on with the Urestes’?

    My husband and I watched the township meeting online and we came away from it thinking, “how in the world can Michele believe she can effectively lead the police department when she has levelled such inflammatory accusations about them “setting her and her husband up”? With the VERY slim chance she could be right, she handled this whole thing wrong. It reminds me of Ross Perot’s last days as a presidential candidate when he went paranoid. Whatever chance he had at being elected was GONE. Michele, not thinking this whole thing through to the end, not taking responsibility for HER wrong choices in accepting the ride home, has sealed her fate. She lost whatever credibility she had with most of the residents of West Bloomfield and she lost whatever respect and trust she may have had with the police department

    Based on her answers/comments during the meeting, it is clear they have already consulted an attorney and chose their words carefully. Yes, he was not charged, but only because Officer Stephens did not follow procedure concerning those who fail the sobriety test. Seems to me from her words of “liable” and the fact her husband sent out a mass email to the residents of their neighborhood asking for a certified copy of the town hall meeting, there is a lawsuit brewing. None of this is good for West Bloomfield. I believe in the interests of our township, Michele needs to step down.

  5. Michael

    September 2, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    I look forward to the day when Michelle will step down and this whole mess will be behind us. Never in 30 years of living here have I seen such a dysfunctional township supervisor

  6. Former WBPD cop

    September 3, 2011 at 7:42 pm

    I must be missing something that is not being reported in the story. The officer used discretion – because after all, in the real world of policing – not every crime discovered results in an arrest. His reasoning for not arresting the offender was partly correct if it was a busy shift then yes, a drunk driving arrest will tie up a lot of time. However if the decision was also for political reasons then it is his error. But a five day suspension is a pretty tough financial hit to an officer who was doing his job, found a problem, resolved it and kept the community safe from further driving by the offender. The initial violation he was was not serious, running the red light while turning right, no other possible accidents mentioned and three points over on the PBT? There must be something else going on here for the officer to take a five day hit.

  7. Wondering

    September 4, 2011 at 8:59 pm

    Why no mention of the automated calls to West Bloomfield homes to come to the special meeting to berate the supervisor?

    Who paid for these calls and when was the order for them placed? Channel 4 did a story which played the call content on air. You can read the content on their webpage.

    If calls went to numbers on the, Do Not Call List, it may be a problem. There is a “political exemption” but, a political committee filing has not been found and that may violate campaign laws.

    Seems the calls may have come from Teleform One, Glendive MT 406-948-8083 on Aug 28th.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login