From Margot Bloomfield, Highland Township:
There are outspoken individuals who overlook our Constitution’s opening words, “We the people,” preferring to promote “me” instead of “we” in their own self interests. Many who support privatizing services our government provides believe that free enterprise is the solution. They promote ideals they say are obtainable for all: unlimited fortunate for those able to achieve monetary security through hard work or circumstances.
The problem is this ideal is achievable for a small minority in our current economic climate. The majority of individuals/families make less than $250,000 a year, as do the majority of small businesses. It is a mystery to me why these same people are supporting policies allowing unlimited wealth to so few. Great countries have policies protecting all their citizens — including the disabled, elderly, and destitute. Compassionate conservatives suggest wealthy individuals and corporations share their wealth through charity. Some do, but voluntarily giving to community and country is based on generosity. We all know that not everyone is generous or compassionate.
Those who want to slash or eliminate government services and supports should then refrain from using federal postal services or collecting Social Security. Perhaps those same politicians should slash their own government salaries. Resolving the national debt on the backs of others less fortunate, and releasing the wealthy individuals and corporations from paying their fair share, is unconscionable.
In 2000, there was no national debt crisis as our federal budget was in the black. Approximately 75 percent of our debt started during the George W. Bush administration, and many millionaires flourished under Bush policies. Yet conservative extremists place the blame at the feet of our current President. These politicians are looking out for their own interests, and those of their wealthy constituents. They are sending a message loud and clear to our country’s majority: “Let them eat cake!”
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
Bill
August 10, 2011 at 10:06 pm
“we the people” also does not mean that “All of you are employed by and paid by only a few of us”…… Or in simpler terms you can understand………… “Government” was established only to oversee and legislatie, not be the single largerst employer in every darn city, county, state and country on the planet! Then again. Easy to write a highly biased and fictional letter that you are certain will get published than to yank one’s head out of one’s hinney and realize that this country was founded and flourished under the concept of “free enterprise” and NOT “Socialism”.
Michigan Mark
August 15, 2011 at 11:41 am
Hello:
There is no common sense to arguments for taxing the rich even more. The money the rich have benefits everybody. Think about it. If I have lots of money, what do I do with it? I could put in the bank – more money for loans to the public and small business. I could buy stocks – more capital for companies to use to hire or to buy more efficient equipment. I could buy a new car, house, clothing, etc. – keeping workers employed who produce these products. If I give it to taxes it is being partially used to pay a middelman (a government employee) to provide the services I could of received at a lower cost without the middleman.
I’m not rich, but I would like to be.